There are a number of advantages and disadvantages of participating in online meetings for gambling addicts. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these meetings as well as how they compare to Alcoholics Anonymous. In addition, it explores the comparisons with other recovery programs such as Narcotics Anonymous. This article also provides the basics of the process and what you can expect from the meetings. Read on to discover more about this new way of gambling.
Participating in online meetings for gamblers anonymous
The first meeting of Gamblers Anonymous is usually the most daunting for problem gamblers. They don’t want to be embarrassed or feel guilty about their condition. However, when they finally attend, they will be welcomed with respect and are shown that they are not alone. They will be given the tools to overcome their addiction, and they will have the opportunity to reconnect with their friends and family. In addition, they will get a renewed sense of self-respect.
| Have you tried Meetn, the new online meeting platform? It’s turning out to become a decent alternative to Zoom and to the other major platforms. |
Taking part in a Gamblers Anonymous session will allow you to connect with others who are struggling with the same problem. The group meets one or more times a week and you can attend the same meeting every week if you wish. Or, you can choose any meeting in your area. The community is made up of men and women who want to end their addiction to gambling. You do not need to belong to any particular religious or political organization to join, as long as you have a genuine desire to quit. The groups are open to people of all races, ages, and backgrounds.
Benefits
A recent study has found that participation in online gambling meetings can have many benefits. While most participants reported having a sponsor, many others reported having very little or no contact with their sponsors. Furthermore, participants in GAs reported feeling a duty to ‘give back’ to the group and to help other gamblers. Here are the benefits of online gambling meetings:
An online GA meeting is convenient for those with hectic schedules. In addition to minimizing travel costs, members can easily attend meetings at their convenience. Online meetings do not disrupt group dynamics, but the online format may disrupt individual interaction within the group. This may have some benefits for service providers and mutual aid groups in the future. But it should be noted that the online format may not provide the same benefits as face-to-face meetings.
Moreover, people with gambling addiction may not be able to attend a GA meeting in person. Even if they can, some GAs have online meetings available. However, these are infrequent and do not provide accountability to meet a particular schedule. Online meetings also reduce the chances of relapses, which can further encourage the gambler. However, there are many advantages to online gambling meetings. There are many benefits to participating in an online gambling meeting, including avoiding isolation and gaining valuable skills.
Disadvantages
Compared to regular meetings, online GA meetings did not replicate the benefits of in-person group dynamics. Rather, they disrupted the individual interactions within a group and led to individuals acting individually. This may have consequences for future service providers and mutual aid groups. Despite these problems, online meetings can be beneficial in certain circumstances. Let’s explore a few of the benefits of online GA meetings.
Often, people suffering from gambling addiction forget the power of meetings and hearing horror stories from others. This sense of togetherness and support is critical to recovery. In addition, the term “horror story” is frequently used in meeting transcripts. It evokes a feeling of panic when one thinks of their gambling experiences. However, the term “horror story” is not necessarily a negative term.
Comparisons with Alcoholics Anonymous
Although the programs and philosophy of Alcoholics Anonymous are similar, the two groups differ in the way they view alcoholism and recovery. Alcoholics Anonymous considers alcoholism as a disease, not as a deviant behavior. This ideology has been the source of much criticism, and the program itself focuses on the person’s recovery rather than the disease. The Washingtonian program, for example, is notorious for its reliance on alcohol. Washingtonians have long been criticized for not practicing the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous.
To estimate the effectiveness of AA and the TSF, researchers examined 27 studies that included 10,565 participants. They then categorized the studies based on three dimensions: study design, degree of manualization, and comparison intervention. Table 2 presents the results of the 27 studies, which are reported in 36 separate papers. Each of the subcategories contains information about the number of studies and sample sizes within each category. The researchers used color coding to facilitate the appraisal of findings. Dark green represents a significant advantage; pale green indicates a trend; and red denotes a substantial disadvantage.