Feelings of togetherness in online meetings for gamblers anonymous differ from in-person meetings. What are the benefits of online meetings? Here are some answers to these questions. In addition, you’ll learn why online meetings for disordered gamblers can be just as effective. If you’ve ever been to a Gam-Anon meeting, you know that the fellowship of fellow members can help. But do online meetings for gamblers really work?
Feelings of togetherness during online meetings for gamblers anonymous
Meetings and the horror stories that are often shared during them are crucial elements of the recovery process. Meetings are vital for the feeling of togetherness and support that GA members experience in the group, and without these, recovery will be impossible. The word “horror story” is used frequently in transcripts of meetings. For some people, this word conjures up feelings of panic and anxiety when they think of their gambling experiences.
| Have you tried Meetn, the new online meeting platform? It’s turning out to become a decent alternative to Zoom and to the other major platforms. |
Although online GA meetings are more accessible than physical meetings, they do not duplicate the social and emotional benefits of group interaction and support. While this study is still early in its development, it does suggest that online meetings can be beneficial for mutual aid groups and future service providers. Although online meetings are not suitable for many people, those suffering from a gambling addiction should not shy away from them. In fact, these meetings may be a good choice for those with busy schedules or limited time to attend face-to-face meetings.
Although online meetings for gamblers anonymous are facilitated by a volunteer, they still offer a sense of togetherness. The group’s goal is to provide a safe environment for problem gamblers who are struggling with their gambling. Because it believes that disordered gambling is an illness, it doesn’t judge its members. The goal is to help them get rid of this compulsion. But the feeling of shame and isolation that surrounds it prevents people from seeking help.
Feelings of togetherness during in-person meetings for disordered gamblers
One study examined the impact of online meetings on feeling of togetherness among disordered gambling patients. It found that while participants were more likely to feel they were not alone, they also felt like they were part of a group. The group’s size was relatively small, with ten to fifteen participants. Overall, participants reported a sense of togetherness, and feelings of togetherness increased over time.
The effectiveness of online meetings for disordered gamblers
The most common motivation for attending online meetings for disordered gamblers was to be reminded of the consequences of relapse, with 45.9% of participants reporting that this reason drove them to attend meetings. Other common motivations included contact with individuals who understood their problem, strengthening their commitment to abstinence, venting pressure, and learning how to handle legal, personal, and financial problems. Meeting other people was also a motivation for attendance, and only 24% of participants reported having regular contact with their sponsor.
In addition, participants’ time spent on meetings was estimated by the number of days between initial and final posts. The length of the posts was estimated by dividing long paragraphs into two-sentence units, and those that were less than three words or started with “http” were removed. In addition, participants’ time experience changed from clearly defined chunks to blurred lines. This change in time experience affected their mental states, and thus their participation in the meetings.
These results were supported by a 2D model of abstinence likelihood slope that responded to each utterance made by a gambler. Personalized evaluation values increased the odds of abstinence. Personalized evaluation values based on previous utterances of a gambler also helped to motivate the gamblers to comment on the meetings. These results indicate that the optimal proportion of change talks increased the likelihood of abstinence, which could result in abstinence among disordered gamblers.