The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Meetings

online meetings vs face to face

Zoom meetings are often more energy-draining than face-to-face meetings. Zoom requires that participants pay attention and tune out background noise. On the other hand, these meetings are a great way to energize individual employees, as they offer more opportunities to engage. Zoom meetings also support a collaborative company culture, so employees feel like they’re part of something bigger than themselves. And since it’s possible to participate in an online meeting from your office, you’ll likely have a more effective and more enjoyable experience than you would with a traditional face-to-face meeting.

Non-verbal cues

The non-verbal cues are the same in both situations: maintaining eye contact and using body language to communicate. When meeting with someone, you should look for signals that the other person is uncomfortable, unsure, or dishonest. If you see signs of these behaviors, it is time to reconsider your approach. Here are some helpful non-verbal cues that will help you improve your communication skills and improve your chances of making a good first impression.

Have you tried Meetn, the new online meeting platform?
It’s turning out to become a decent alternative to Zoom and to the other major platforms.

In order to be effective at sending non-verbal cues, you need to understand your own emotions and those of others. This helps you read their body language and understand their unspoken messages. Using non-verbal cues is also a way to build trust and show you care. In addition to using body language to communicate your message, non-verbal cues can help you avoid the pitfalls of social media.

Carbon footprint

The carbon footprint of face-to-face conferences is comparable to that of virtual conferences. But the carbon footprint of online meetings is substantially lower. This article examines the environmental impact of switching from face-to-face conferences to virtual events. The article uses the example of the largest European Political Science conference to calculate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated by the virtual and the physical event. It accounts for the emissions produced by electricity, travel and catering for attendees. The virtual conference’s carbon footprint is between 97 and 200 times lower than that of the physical event.

In addition to a comparison of the carbon footprints of online and face-to-face conferences, the study analyzed the travel emissions of individual conference participants. In general, virtual conferences reduce transportation emissions by about 90%, which is much higher than the carbon footprint from face-to-face meetings. The reason for this difference is the difference in transportation emissions. Nearly half of the emissions are caused by long-distance travel.


The efficiency of online meetings differs depending on the size of the group, the type of meeting, and the participants’ education. Respondents with doctorates and higher educational qualifications are more efficient than those with less education, but this effect is less pronounced among GCSE students. The amount of time and money spent improving WFH also differs among respondents. The efficiency of face-to-face meetings is still higher than that of online meetings, but the relative benefits of online meetings are a big advantage for online meetings.

An in-person meeting fosters trust and cooperation. A good cup of coffee with colleagues or a yoga class after a long day on panels can improve teamwork and foster new relationships. A handshake and casual conversation are also effective tools for establishing trust. Studies have shown that face-to-face requests result in 34 times greater productivity than those made via email. Furthermore, a physical handshake promotes cooperation and influences the outcomes of negotiations.

Inclusion of individuals’ communication styles

A study conducted by the Harvard Business Review found that organizations that use both methods have the advantage of diversity, but virtual meetings can also be more impersonal. Regardless of how well a virtual meeting is facilitated, it is important to consider individuals’ communication styles when making a decision. Diversity in an organization is essential to finding innovative solutions. Diverse voices contribute to more meaningful innovations. Diversity, however, does not always translate into inclusion. In fact, not all meeting attendees feel empowered to offer their best ideas or opinions. Virtual meetings cannot level the playing field.

While virtual meetings tend to make multitasking more difficult, the benefits of face-to-face meetings are substantial. In-person meetings reduce distractions, with participants not getting their phones out during the meeting to check their email. Similarly, virtual meetings are more likely to generate more conflict than face-to-face ones, so it is essential to take individuals’ communication styles into account when making a decision.